“[Tucker] Carlson’s pro-Putin act is so helpful that Russian state television has been rebroadcasting it with Russian subtitles.” . . .
“[I]t’s important to remember what Carlson is: nothing more than an outrage machine. What he offers is not political commentary. It’s Fox-approved nonsense meant to juice ratings — and it works.
“Don’t take my word for it. In 2020, Fox’s own lawyers successfully made the case in court that Carlson shouldn’t be taken seriously. And a Trump-appointed federal judge agreed.”
—Margaret Sullivan, media reporter, “Now is the time to remember what Fox's own lawyers said about Tucker Carlson,” The Washington Post, Feb. 24, 2022.
• Editorial Comment: And All-Amurikan Faux viewers root for the Russkies. Weird.
Read all about it! The March issue of Senior News: Age & Ageism. Check it out!
FREE! TODAY'S WORD ON JOURNALISM This
free “service” is sent to rafts of subscribers worldwide more or less
every weekday morning during WORD season. If you have recovered from
whatever illness led you to subscribe and don’t want it anymore, send
“unsubscribe” to ted.pease@gmail.com. Or if you want to afflict someone
else, send me the email address and watch the fun begin. (Disclaimer: Don’t shoot the messenger. I just quote ’em, I don’t necessarily endorse ’em.)
_____________
Edward C. Pease, Ph.D.
Professor & Department Head Emeritus
Department of Journalism & Communication
Utah State University
Today's WORD on Journalism
No comments:
Post a Comment