Dis‘Content’
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/64d12/64d125a0590241bd8b03947643474182dde0c45a" alt=""
—Garrison Keillor, radio curmudgeon, in response to a listener question about how he develops “content” for his radio show, “The Prairie Home Companion,” 2009
(Thanks to alert WORDster Tim Harrower)
(Thanks to alert WORDster Tim Harrower)
Editor’s Note: Sort of Twinkie news?
PeezPix: Harvest Time
WRITING PROF WANTED! JCOM @ USU is hiring! A search for a new tenure-track faculty member to focus on the teaching of writing. Revolutionary! See job posting at Utah State University HR or email ted.pease@usu.edu.
NEWS NOTE: 2010 Sundance film 8: The Mormon Proposition, comes to the USU campus next week with Q&A discussion with filmmaker Reed Cowan, a 1997 USU broadcast journalism alumnus. Thursday, Oct. 21, 7 p.m., Eccles Conference Center Auditorium. URL
NOTE: Today’s WORD on Journalism is now on Facebook! Join up and rant daily! And join USU JCOM Alumni & Friends on FB.
Content. The better to commoditize, financialize, and monetize you with, my dear.
ReplyDeleteYou, Mister Keillor, are merely filling a bucket, to be passed and parsed among a vast sea of other buckets.
Here's one more word to contemplate: fungible.
Content- it's a nice catch all word that tells you absolutely nothing about the subject only that there is one. It also hints at the possibility that the user of the word "content" doesn't know anything about the subject.
ReplyDeleteI agree I don't like the word either.
Erica Abbott