Blog This
“Is journalism education being too carried away by exuberant interest for the latest digital device, its varied applications for breaking news in real-time, and emphasis on digital media
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3cd87/3cd87aa784e74ab9039a075d236d21b754ea2ada" alt=""
“Are we losing sight of the fundamental function of journalism education? Which is to educate students to become journalists of conscience and integrity, to be responsive and passionate about exposing the disparities, poor governance, political patronage and the many layers of injustices and corruption in their respective communities. This is a prosaic observation, clichéd even. My point is good journalism should not be confused with multimedia delivery, website design, podcasting, blogging and packaging stories.”
—Eric Loo, journalism professor, University of Wollongong (Australia), “Editorial: Back to basics in journalism education amid the techno hype,” Asia Pacific Media Educator 20, 2010.
• Editorial Comment: But the passionate Tweet gets read, and the multimedia storytelling gets heard. I'll read the five-part investigation tomorrow.
MORE INTERESTING STUFF . . . .
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/59929/59929708c024a5353d4989146e6a28ff5741458c" alt=""
• Sundance 2012 opens with powerful Aussie film, Wish You Were Here, by Ben Hansen
• 250 brave icy Hyrum waters to take ‘Polar Plunge’ for Special Olympics, by Kristi Ottley
• Flooded basements, closed roads still the story in Cache Valley, by Jemina Herrero
• LaPlante: Doing ‘missionary journalism,’ from classroom to war zone, by Kristen Munson
• North Logan boundary change may affect corn maze, by Steve Kent
• Guv gives Aggies political pep talk, vows more support for colleges, by Allie Jeppson
PeezPIX by Ted Pease• PeezPix cards & prints
. . . Catalog here.
Dr. Seuss weeds.
.
Sorry, Ted, I disagree with your flip-off comment and I strongly agree with Professor Loo of Wollongong (no doubt our Indian names sound funny to them, too...Oklahoma? Tuskegee? Utah, even?)
ReplyDeleteIf I have to sit still for one more row of talking heads nitpicking the odds on each GOP horse, or endure another “analysis” that tells me zip re the content of whatever they’re supposed to be analyzing and everying about the latest polling, I may throw up all over my screen.
I swear to God, if FDR had given his “nothing to feah but feah itself” speech today, they’d be surveying how it played among the different Florida ethnics. And nitpicking his accent. And generally distracting all of us from what he was trying to say. (And yes, I’m thinking of most of what I’ve heard so far in “analysis” of Obama’s terrific SoU speech.)
Am copying this to old friend Phil Meyer at Chapel Hill, who may be largely responsible for the epidemic of poll-based journalism but is completely blameless for its rampant abuse.
Best--
Ann B.