.The Decline of the Inquiring MindBy Ted Pease(The Utah Statesman, Sept. 8, 2010 URL)
It used to be that, “Inquiring minds want to know.”
The National Inquirer built America’s most successful supermarket tabloid on that premise.
So what is it these days, when there’s more information available at a mouseclick or the end of a tweet than any sane inquiring mind can possible absorb? Why are we getting dumber—or at least less well informed—than we used to be?
Consider these factoids:
• 81%—American households with Internet.
• 3,518—Hours/year U.S. adults and teens spend consuming mass media.
• 18—Hours/week online of average American.
• 7.5—Hours/day online for kids 8-18.
• 55-65—Age of fastest growing Facebook demographic.
• 33%—Women 18-34 who say they check Facebook before brushing their teeth in the morning.
By most measures, we are the most connected people ever. So why aren’t we the best informed society ever? Clearly, we are not:
• 27%—Americans who believe Barack Obama was not born in the U.S. (41% of registered Republicans).
• 18%—Those who think Obama is a Muslim (34% of Republicans).
• 47%—Americans who rate Fox News “most trusted.”
• 33%—Americans under 30 who get news primarily from late-night talk shows.
• 25%—Americans 18-24 who don’t read/watch/listen to any news daily.
In the age of instant information, why are we becoming such ill-informed sheep?
Part of the answer might relate to that last factoid: Declining news habits, new technologies and the economic downturn since 2008 have killed off more than 100 daily U.S. newspapers over the past 18 months, and those that survive are hanging on by a thread.
Even
The New York Times (“All the News That’s Fit to Print”) is flirting with bankruptcy, and “America’s Newspaper,”
USA Today, just cut about 130 newsroom positions. Last week, Utah’s oldest daily newspaper,
The Deseret News, fired almost half its newsroom staff (five Aggies lost their jobs) and will partner with KSL-TV to provide more with less.
But that’s not why Americans are less well informed than they used to be.
The failing health of the news business—newspapers, news magazines, TV news—may be a canary in the social mineshaft that indicates a loss of oxygen to our collective brains, but it’s not the cause of citizen ignorance. In the past decade, understanding of public policy has declined, and disengagement in informed debate on important societal issues has increased, until fewer and fewer people have any idea why they believe the sometimes whacko things they do.
The problem is a combination of intellectual laziness, a lack of curiosity, disengagement in our communities, plus technological, economic and political factors that have converged to make us more ignorant of the world around us—generally and specifically—despite more access to information than ever. What we’re lacking is the ability to discern the difference between rumor and information, between informed opinion and bug-eyed rant, between news and entertainment.
“Journalists, and those who critique them, like to believe that facts conquer all. If the press reports quickly, fully and responsibly, myths will be dispelled, scales will fall from eyes, and society will be guided along the path of reason,”
writes Time columnist James Poneiwozik.
But Americans seem less able to differentiate between truth and fiction than they once were. Today, instead of making us better informed and more capable of informed self-governance, the constant barrage from smart phones and instant Tweets and Facebook friends and viral videos baffles and confuses us, making us either apathetic or angry enough to march on Washington.
But angry about what? That the president is a foreign-born Muslim? (False) That social justice is code for socialism or fascism? (Glenn Beck) That illegal immigrants are being beheaded in Arizona? (False) That immigrants come to American not for freedom and opportunity, but to have “anchor babies” and cheat us out of social services? (Puleeze!)
Where does this stuff come from? It’s the echo chamber of blogs and tweets and twits, pundits and ranters on TV and online who concoct and repeat myths, lies and damned lies, either just for fun or out of ideological malice—lies that are absorbed wholesale by people too befuddled by all the noise to apply critical thinking and skepticism. For them, addicted and abducted by what passes for “fair and balanced” information these days, believing the pundits (with whom they tend to agree in the first place) is just easier than thinking for themselves.
“Rumors and conspiracy theories are oddly comforting” Poneiwozik says. “They simplify a complex world—one that experts constantly get wrong.”
If you’re reading this, you probably don’t need these lessons as much as your classmates who don’t generally pay much attention to the news, who don’t know much about public affairs and policy debates, and who don’t really care anyway.
College professors worry about these things. We’re in the business of helping to grow and feed inquiring minds, not with the breathless sensationalism of supermarket pulp (“I Had Bigfoot’s Baby!”), but with the capacity to question, reflect and think for ourselves.
Students who don’t learn how to question authority become adults who follow sheeplike where others tell them to go, and have no need of information that could lead to independent thought. Those students need remedial Critical Thinking 101. America needs fewer sheep, and more inquiring minds that want to know.
“First: Google and other internet companies have no business telling anybody how to do content business, given that the majority have no real experience in it.
