Thursday, September 9, 2010

On Inquiring Minds, Critical Thinking & Sheep

.
The Decline of the Inquiring Mind
By Ted Pease
(The Utah Statesman, Sept. 8, 2010 URL)

It used to be that, “Inquiring minds want to know.” The National Inquirer built America’s most successful supermarket tabloid on that premise.

So what is it these days, when there’s more information available at a mouseclick or the end of a tweet than any sane inquiring mind can possible absorb? Why are we getting dumber—or at least less well informed—than we used to be?

Consider these factoids:
• 81%—American households with Internet.
• 3,518—Hours/year U.S. adults and teens spend consuming mass media.
• 18—Hours/week online of average American.
• 7.5—Hours/day online for kids 8-18.
• 55-65—Age of fastest growing Facebook demographic.
• 33%—Women 18-34 who say they check Facebook before brushing their teeth in the morning.

By most measures, we are the most connected people ever. So why aren’t we the best informed society ever? Clearly, we are not:
• 27%—Americans who believe Barack Obama was not born in the U.S. (41% of registered Republicans).
• 18%—Those who think Obama is a Muslim (34% of Republicans).
• 47%—Americans who rate Fox News “most trusted.”
• 33%—Americans under 30 who get news primarily from late-night talk shows.
• 25%—Americans 18-24 who don’t read/watch/listen to any news daily.

In the age of instant information, why are we becoming such ill-informed sheep?

Part of the answer might relate to that last factoid: Declining news habits, new technologies and the economic downturn since 2008 have killed off more than 100 daily U.S. newspapers over the past 18 months, and those that survive are hanging on by a thread.

Even The New York Times (“All the News That’s Fit to Print”) is flirting with bankruptcy, and “America’s Newspaper,” USA Today, just cut about 130 newsroom positions. Last week, Utah’s oldest daily newspaper, The Deseret News, fired almost half its newsroom staff (five Aggies lost their jobs) and will partner with KSL-TV to provide more with less.

But that’s not why Americans are less well informed than they used to be.

The failing health of the news business—newspapers, news magazines, TV news—may be a canary in the social mineshaft that indicates a loss of oxygen to our collective brains, but it’s not the cause of citizen ignorance. In the past decade, understanding of public policy has declined, and disengagement in informed debate on important societal issues has increased, until fewer and fewer people have any idea why they believe the sometimes whacko things they do.

The problem is a combination of intellectual laziness, a lack of curiosity, disengagement in our communities, plus technological, economic and political factors that have converged to make us more ignorant of the world around us—generally and specifically—despite more access to information than ever. What we’re lacking is the ability to discern the difference between rumor and information, between informed opinion and bug-eyed rant, between news and entertainment.

“Journalists, and those who critique them, like to believe that facts conquer all. If the press reports quickly, fully and responsibly, myths will be dispelled, scales will fall from eyes, and society will be guided along the path of reason,” writes Time columnist James Poneiwozik.

But Americans seem less able to differentiate between truth and fiction than they once were. Today, instead of making us better informed and more capable of informed self-governance, the constant barrage from smart phones and instant Tweets and Facebook friends and viral videos baffles and confuses us, making us either apathetic or angry enough to march on Washington.

But angry about what? That the president is a foreign-born Muslim? (False) That social justice is code for socialism or fascism? (Glenn Beck) That illegal immigrants are being beheaded in Arizona? (False) That immigrants come to American not for freedom and opportunity, but to have “anchor babies” and cheat us out of social services? (Puleeze!)

Where does this stuff come from? It’s the echo chamber of blogs and tweets and twits, pundits and ranters on TV and online who concoct and repeat myths, lies and damned lies, either just for fun or out of ideological malice—lies that are absorbed wholesale by people too befuddled by all the noise to apply critical thinking and skepticism. For them, addicted and abducted by what passes for “fair and balanced” information these days, believing the pundits (with whom they tend to agree in the first place) is just easier than thinking for themselves.

“Rumors and conspiracy theories are oddly comforting” Poneiwozik says. “They simplify a complex world—one that experts constantly get wrong.”

If you’re reading this, you probably don’t need these lessons as much as your classmates who don’t generally pay much attention to the news, who don’t know much about public affairs and policy debates, and who don’t really care anyway.

College professors worry about these things. We’re in the business of helping to grow and feed inquiring minds, not with the breathless sensationalism of supermarket pulp (“I Had Bigfoot’s Baby!”), but with the capacity to question, reflect and think for ourselves.

Students who don’t learn how to question authority become adults who follow sheeplike where others tell them to go, and have no need of information that could lead to independent thought. Those students need remedial Critical Thinking 101. America needs fewer sheep, and more inquiring minds that want to know.

18 comments:

  1. As the mass media gets bigger, I believe there will be more "sheep". Because, Facebook, Twitter, and blogging are more fun and interesting to watch and participate in, then watching the news or grabbing a newspaper. There's tons of gossip, pictures, and you can talk about whatever you want. The media will keep improving FB, Twitter, and blogging since it's bringing in loads of money and the old fashioned news and newspapers will die. My friends rather be on Facebook then grab a newspaper... times are changing

    -Romina Nedakovic

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree I feel that in our society and with the modern technology there is a sense of instant gratification. It we cannot access it in one second at the tip our our fingers we're not interested. In another one of my classes we were just discussing the issue of students today and reading. Our teacher read us some statistics of how many books were required literature for classes 30 years ago to 20, 10 and today. The required text had declined from around 10 books a class down to one and how students today complain more than ever about having to read. It just goes to show we may have more information at our disposal but do not have the patience or desire to take advantage of it.

    Stephanie Harries

    ReplyDelete
  3. I expect this sort of blind ignorance from my elderly mother - I've giving up on correcting her. When Saddam Hussein was captured, she called me in jubilation, saying "We got Osama!" She still believes that Saddam was part of the 9/11 terrorist attacks and that there were weapons of mass destruction found in Iraq. That's my mom, bless her heart. But I did not expect this same sort of thing from my smart savvy husband. He really reminded me of my mother when he came home recently and informed me "Well, they've finally got Obama now - he's done." Oh really, I commented. "Yes, they found his real birth certificate from Kenya. He's outa here." I had to stop and just look at him. Who are "they," I asked him. "Well... you know, the news," he said. I asked him specifically what news he was referring to. I had not seen it on any of the networks and neither had he. "News on the internet," he informed me. Okay now we were getting somewhere. It had actually come IN AN EMAIL from a friend of a friend of his dad in Milwaukee. I was able to show him a couple of fact check sites that explained the untruth of this claim, and even show how far back in time it had been disproven - but I was frustrated that I had to look it up for him. He's not stupid. Just maybe a little gullible and in this case maybe a little lazy. Even smart and savvy people tend to take what they hear at face value. Sigh.

    ReplyDelete
  4. should be "given up," sorry - I hit that post button a bit too fast.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I agree with you, and I’m actually sending this from my iPhone. Ok not really, but it could be done. I feel like in the past few years I haven’t learned as much as when I actually had to pick up a book and read it, or look up a definition. My inquiring mind was declining as soon as I graduated high school and took a year off to live with my party animal friends and work a full time job. At the time it was fun, but my brain became a vegetable and just sat there while most of my other friends were out there continuing their education. I think that people spend too much time looking up things online that have no significance or importance to that person rather than looking at their local news website. One excuse I had for not watching the news was that I didn’t have a digital converter. I finally decided it was time to work out this muscle of a brain I had in me and bought a converter and now I’m watching the news more often. I think its little setbacks like these that make others less informed and less motivated to give a lick about what’s happening in the world around them.

    ReplyDelete
  6. The filter at my work only allows me access to a certain news site (KSL), and I'm alright with that. I prefer local news, anyway. I know it's not possible for even those reporters to be completely objective, but you can't fault them for not trying. I usually get about 2-3 Antibama emails a day, and still have yet to actually take any of the information in them with more than a grain of salt.
    I'm also one of the non-readers you're talking about. I read my email. I read reports at work. I read for classes. The last thing I want to do when I'm done with all of that is to pick up a Louis L'Amour and dive in. I'd much rather kick my feet up and watch some DVR'd Family Guy (which, might I add, I don't take it even with a grain of salt). I just enjoy shutting the ol' brain down after a while. I think I even heard on Coast-To-Coast the other night that switching the mind to it's 'Off' position and watching TV can be good for you because of the information overload you get throughout the day? George Noory for ya.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I think what society needs is a happy medium. It will probably never happen but it would be ideal in my mind. Be concerned about the world around you, but not to the point that your personal life caves in on itself. People can only do so much worrying before you end up in a loony bin. Like Eric said, it's good to shut off the brain for a while and just relax. The problems come when it's shut of and the switch ends up stationary.

    ReplyDelete
  8. It is interesting how facts get mixed up with fiction. It's like Dave Ramsey says, "If you tell a lie often enough and loud enough, eventually it becomes a fact." Of course he wasn't talking about the internet and the wealth of information available to us, but I think that is still a valid point even in this discussion.

    I must admit that if I hear something often enough- even on the internet, I do start to believe it. But now it's even more important than ever that we learn how to decipher fact from fiction. I guess that's when we figure out how to use our own brains, eh?

    Erica Abbott

    ReplyDelete
  9. The question is not whether people listen to mass media, but even this one article states that most Americans are stupid when we don't believe in the great New York Times. Let's start with the facts that the New York Times is almost bankrupt why would that be. One part of this article criticizes the second most listened to talk show host Glen Beck, with ratings going through the roof. According to these article I thought that Americans weren't following the media. No, Americans are not following the main stream media, but instead are following what they consider truth and a different media sources. This is the large disconnect form some of our largest media instead of change there connect in there media stream the attacker the American people as not informed and stupid. I do not think that we are less informed but just sick of the agendas that are being portrayed by this media sources. I would rather find out for myself the whole store then just an abridged form some writer with some agenda.

    ReplyDelete
  10. It could possibly be that we are simply tired of hearing all the "bad news". When I watch the news I usually end up feeling sad and somewhat ashamed of the people I share this society with. When I have to usher my small children from the room just to watch the nightly news I find myself loosing the want to watch. Mass media is definetly a huge benefit to keeping yourself informed, but there has to be more "good news" out there. I understand the world is not a perfect place, but sometimes reality hurt. The news media seems to almost glorify the all the bad and just squeeze in the good. We live in such a fast paced world that it truly is hard to select the best news source, sometimes catching a glimpse of the magazine rack while waiting in line at the market is all the news some people get. Since becoming a college student I have made a huge effort to enlighten myself with credible news sources but dang the news is heartbreaking sometimes.

    ReplyDelete
  11. It seems to me that one major problem is the fact that people don't want to hear things they disagree with. But how can you be enlightened about the world around you if you are in denial? Things are going on that we all may disagree with, things that are against our belief system. Part of having a good argument though is knowing what's happening on the opposite end. If we only know about what we support or believe, we'll never be truly well informed.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Insane to think how ill informed US citizens are. Especially when you look at the statistics of how much time they spend on Facebook and on the web. They can browse through their friends profiles for updates on the social network but they can't take a moment to click over to see what changes their have been in the world around them even on things that will affect them directly. The thing that worries me is that these are the same people voting to put men into positions to make decisions that will affect them and their families when they do not know what these issues are!

    ReplyDelete
  13. I am guilty of spending far too much time on blog sites or facebook. However, I still make time to read and learn of the news surrounding me. I feel like people today are making the mistake of choosing not to worry or even care of the events around them. It’s a shame really. Reading this and seeing the statistics involving mass media sites, I think if everyone would check a news site instead of their facebook every day, we’d all be better off.

    ReplyDelete
  14. The majority of America has been slipping through the cracks and still able to live without having to be savvy about politics, local news or even world news. Most of us couldn't tell you who our own Mayor for our city is let alone the Vice President of America. As a rule, man only cares about something that directly affects him, so it makes sense why Facebook is more appealing rather than writing an article for a news paper. You get instant gratification for what you put as your status on FB rather than being one of thousands or millions trying to change America. It's so easy to be briefed on what is going on from someone's opinion rather than do research and collect information to form your own thoughts. Of course I'm also guilty of falling prey to both. Entertainment is meant for that: entertainment, and it helps us get away from the stresses of life, but it would do us all a lot of good to find a balance between entertainment and knowledge. We didn't become the strongest Country in the world by being a bunch of followers, so we need to STOP it now. Order is control and knowledge is power, we should be the most knowledgeable people with all the technology we have so lets put it to good use.

    --Chelsea Ebeling

    ReplyDelete
  15. I think the title says it all!! I had this discussion at work with a co-worker saying how he felt bad for this upcoming genreation because the only way they will know how to communicate is through media or through electronics and not personally or face to face. Kids grow up learning how to text and facebook and they think that's good enough and you get them out in the open and they struggle, I think it's gonna be tough to see in five years.

    Sheldon Hill

    ReplyDelete
  16. Its so true! More people are concerned with what their Facebook "friends" are posting about the upcoming party or game than they are with current events. Even I find myself wasting time at least once a week browsing on Facebook. I wonder what I could accomplish if I just deleted my account. --Nicole Murray

    ReplyDelete
  17. Growing up in a house where my Dad has to watch the news at least twice a day, you would think that habit might rub off on me. I find that I am one of those who would prefer find out “news” on Facebook, rather than picking up a newspaper and reading about real life events that are happening all over the world, you know, the important stuff. I’m also one of those that fits the, “intellectually laziness, a lack of curiosity, disengagement in our communities,” category. E! News calls my name more than CNN or the late night news, and I know I’m not the only one. Why is it that people are so fascinated with celebrities and wealth, and not real life happenings that are actually important? But I’ve realized in this short time I have been in this class, that finding out about the news is ACTUALLY very interesting and I know it is very important, especially living in a time that we are living in.

    ReplyDelete
  18. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete